home
Skip to content
  • About us
    • About us
    • Aims and accountability
    • Who we are
    • Meetings
    • Committees
    • Recruitment
    • FAQ
  • Sentencing information
    • Sentencing information
    • Introduction to sentencing
    • How do courts decide a sentence?
    • Community sentences
    • Custodial sentences
    • Maximum and minimum sentences
    • Disposals and appeals
    • Information for victims
  • Sentencing guidelines
    • Sentencing guidelines
    • Approved guidelines
    • Guidelines in development
    • How are sentencing guidelines developed?
    • About sentencing guidelines
  • Publications
    • Publications
    • Guideline judgments
    • Sentencing Statements
  • Research and engagement
    • Research and engagement
    • Consultations
    • Research
    • Engagement
  • Education resources
    • Education resources
    • Jargon buster
    • Myth buster
    • 'If you were the judge' case studies
    • Lectures and lesson plans
  • News and media
    • News and media
    • News
    • Scottish Sentencing Conversations Podcast
    • Spotlight on Sentencing Blog
    • Spotlight on Sentencing Circular
    • Videos
    • Contact us
  • ?
  • A-Z
Scottish Sentencing Council Logo
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. New research reveals public attitudes to sentence reductions in Scotland

New research reveals public attitudes to sentence reductions in Scotland

Research
6th March 2025

The Scottish Sentencing Council has today published new research exploring public attitudes towards sentence reductions following guilty pleas in Scotland. The research reveals that the Scottish public holds nuanced views about reducing sentences for guilty pleas, with support varying significantly based on the crime type and timing of the plea. While many recognise potential benefits like cost savings and sparing victims from trials, there are concerns about maintaining appropriate punishment for serious offences.

The study, ‘Public attitudes to sentences following a guilty plea: Findings from a mixed methods research project’ was conducted by researchers from the University of Glasgow, University of Strathclyde, the Sentencing Academy and the University of Leeds, and combines focus group discussions with a representative national survey.

The study found that public support for sentence reductions increases when the benefits are explained. Survey results show 35% are in support when the benefits are outlined, compared to 27% when there is no explanation. However, support varies by offence type, with 51% backing reductions for non-violent crimes like fraud, dropping to 41% for violent offences. Findings also included a unanimous preference among focus group participants for the term 'sentence reduction' over 'sentence discount', with the latter viewed as not always reflecting the significance of criminal proceedings.

While public views of sentencing are complex, many respondents highlighted concerns about transparency in sentencing and that it was not always clear how sentences are calculated and implemented. This illustrates a need for greater transparency of information about sentencing to be available.

The Council will consider these findings as it develops guidelines on guilty plea sentence reductions in Scotland.

Additional

Prev
Next
Back To News

Contact us/ media enquiries

 

Social media policy

 

Scottish Sentencing Council, Parliament House, Edinburgh, EH1 1RQ

Tel: 0300 790 0006 Email: sentencingcouncil@scotcourts.gov.uk
Follow us on social:
  • Accessibility
  • Complaints
  • Cookies
  • © Crown Copyright
  • FAQs
  • Jargon Buster
  • Privacy
  • Site Map
  • Useful links